Final vs provisional accreditation for ASPs

A note from our own research

While building the ASP directory, we reviewed each of the 44 accredited providers' official websites looking for their exact accreditation status. The result: most providers write only "accredited by the Ministry of Finance" or "Pre-Approved ASP" with no further detail. A small number were genuinely explicit about it — and that gap itself is useful information for you as a customer.

Why does final vs provisional actually matter?

Any service provider's accreditation process typically goes through stages: an application and initial review by the relevant authority, then actual technical testing (such as Peppol network compatibility and PINT AE format conformance), then full accreditation once all tests are passed. A provider "under review" or "in testing" may be listed on a preliminary list but hasn't yet proven full technical readiness for live operation.

Meaning: if you sign with a provider still in the testing phase and expect immediate go-live, you might be surprised by delays or technical issues during your most critical period — right before your deadline.

How to verify the actual status

1. Check the official register directly at mof.gov.ae — this is the only 100% authoritative source, not any directory or third-party site (including ours).
2. Ask the provider directly for their accreditation number and effective date in writing — any serious provider can give you this without hesitation.
3. Ask specifically: "Have you completed Peppol network conformance testing?" — a specific technical question that's hard to sidestep with a generic answer.

How we handle this variance in our own directory

Instead of guessing or classifying every provider as "final" or "provisional" without a clear basis, we chose a more honest approach: every provider page in our directory carries an "accreditation status" field that quotes exactly the wording the provider itself uses on its official website — with no added interpretation from us. If the wording is vague, we leave it vague rather than inventing precision that doesn't exist. Full details of our approach are on the Methodology & Sources page.

Read next